Skip to main content Skip to navigation within this section
Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

This Royal Commission is an independent inquiry into abuse in state care and in the care of faith-based institutions in Aotearoa New Zealand.

  • Reports Ngā pūrongo
    • Whanaketia
    • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
    • Beautiful Children: Inquiry into the Lake Alice Child and Adolescent Unit
    • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
    • Tāwharautia: Interim Report
    • Administrative Report
  • Survivors Ngā purapura ora
    • Survivor experiences
    • Survivor videos
    • Getting help and support
  • Research and engagement Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono
    • How people engaged with the Inquiry
    • Public hearings
    • Research
    • Evidence library
  • Background material Ngā raupapa tuara
    • About the Royal Commission
    • Inquiry team
    • Advisory groups and reference groups
    • Quarterly reports
    • Timeline
    • Questions and answers
    • Pānui
    • News
  • Document library Kohinga tuhinga
    • Document library
    • Case studies
    • Recommendations
    • Summaries and guides
Quick Exit
AdobeStock 256119535
  • Home
  • Reports
  • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
  • Other faith-based institutions’ claims processes
Listen

Other faith-based institutions’ claims processes

We obtained information from 11 other faith-based institutions about their claims processes. They are: Assemblies of God, Baptist Church, Gloriavale Christian Community, Lutheran Church, Methodist Church, Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses, Plymouth Brethren Christian Church, Presbyterian Church, Reformed Church, Seventh Day Adventists and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

We found that some had well-developed claims processes and others had none. Many institutions, at least initially, had no formal claims process and no overall policy to guide complaints about abuse in care. They responded to reports of abuses on an ad-hoc basis, which resulted in considerable variation in responses. Some would employ an independent lawyer to look into reports of abuse, and others would investigate themselves. In some cases, institutions undertook no internal investigation, depriving survivors of the ability to obtain any redress at all. Financial compensation ranged from $5,000 to $60,000. The Methodist Church offered the highest levels of compensation.

Some did not offer apologies. Those offering apologies did so in writing or in person. In one case, an institution declined to offer an unconditional apology, instead apologising “if the offending did occur”. These institutions did not routinely offer counselling. Few offered any form of non-monetary redress.

In some cases, they made group settlements. Presbyterian Support Central appointed a senior independent lawyer to investigate claims of abuse at Berhampore Children’s Home in Wellington. The lawyer didn’t believe any of the survivors, and nothing came of their claims. Later, in February 2007, Presbyterian Support Central reversed its position and offered the nine survivors $25,000 each and a meeting with the Presbyterian Support Central board. It also agreed to install a memorial at the site of the residence and hold a ceremony there.

Sometimes institutions used confidentiality clauses to prevent survivors from speaking out about the settlement or speaking critically about the institution that had harmed them. The inclusion of confidentiality clauses in settlement agreements has become less common in recent times, but such clauses can still be found. 

Information provided to us by institutions shows they sometimes viewed survivors in a harsh light. Survivors have at times been described as only after the money, potential reputational risks and others have been discouraged from seeking financial compensation at all.

 

Next: Summary of findings

1-1-introduction-9
  • 2.4: Faith-based institutions' processes
  • Catholic Church
  • Anglican Church
  • The Salvation Army
  • Other faith-based institutions’ claims processes
  • Summary of findings
Site Logo Light
Connect with us
  • Find us on Facebook


    • Legal Menu
      • Privacy policy
      • Terms
      • Accessibility
      • Contact us
    • Ngā pūrongo Reports
      • Whanaketia
      • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
      • Beautiful Children
      • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu
      • Tāwharautia: Pūrongo o te Wā
      • Administrative report
    • Ngā purapura ora Survivors
      • Getting help and support
      • Questions and answers
      • Survivor stories
    • Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono Research and engagement
      • How people engaged with the Inquiry
      • Public hearings
      • Research
    • Te tuara me tōna raupapa Background and material
      • About the Royal Commission
      • Inquiry team
      • Advisory Groups and Reference Groups
      • Quarterly reports
      • Timeline
      • Pānui
    • Kohinga tuhinga Document library
      • Document Library
      • Case studies
      • Recommendations
      • Summaries and guides

    © 2025 Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry