Skip to main content Skip to navigation within this section
Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

This Royal Commission is an independent inquiry into abuse in state care and in the care of faith-based institutions in Aotearoa New Zealand.

  • Reports Ngā pūrongo
    • Whanaketia
    • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
    • Beautiful Children: Inquiry into the Lake Alice Child and Adolescent Unit
    • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
    • Tāwharautia: Interim Report
    • Administrative Report
  • Survivors Ngā purapura ora
    • Survivor experiences
    • Survivor videos
    • Getting help and support
  • Research and engagement Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono
    • How people engaged with the Inquiry
    • Public hearings
    • Research
    • Evidence library
  • Background material Ngā raupapa tuara
    • About the Royal Commission
    • Inquiry team
    • Advisory groups and reference groups
    • Quarterly reports
    • Timeline
    • Questions and answers
    • Pānui
    • News
  • Document library Kohinga tuhinga
    • Document library
    • Case studies
    • Recommendations
    • Summaries and guides
Quick Exit
AdobeStock 101472581
  • Home
  • Reports
  • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
  • Redress was inadequate to restore mana or oranga
Listen

Redress was inadequate to restore mana or oranga

Monetary payments and an apology are the key parts of settlement offers, and for most agencies and faith-based institutions, are the only redress offered. A small number of counselling sessions are included in some offers and at times, other forms of non-monetary redress have been provided. But what survivors said they also needed was help with employment training, housing support and other practical ways to get their lives back on track. Tanya and Georgina Sammons said a big impediment was their lack of education and having to build connections to their family and culture from scratch. Loretta Ryder said: “I don’t really want the money. I want a house for all of my kids on our land. The answer for me lies with the people.” Another survivor, Mr A, said The Salvation Army needed to offer substantive forms of support, not just money. He was unhappy with the dollar value put on his years in care, and said he would have preferred to have someone actively help in his prison-release plan and a life coach to help him stay out of prison.

For many Māori, restoring the mana of the survivor, including their wider whānau, is necessary to putting right the harm that was done. This includes restoring connection to whakapapa, community and whenua. One survivor explained, “connection and relationships are what heals people. When you take away those connections you take away the wellbeing of that person”.

Māori survivors have told us that they wanted specific steps to support individual and collective well-being, and help to connect or reconnect to whakapapa and culture. Pacific survivors have also emphasised wanting cultural restoration, including for example learning language.  

Keith Wiffin said he considered redress to be about “restoring the wellbeing of those people affected [and] this means their health and their broader needs: things like counselling, education, housing.” Another survivor said she was “seeking justice for my spirit, my heart”.

 

Next: No ability to respond to harm to whānau

1-1-introduction-10
  • 2.5: Survivors’ experiences of State and faith redress processes
  • Māori faces and tikanga values nowhere to be seen
  • Pacific survivors’ culture overlooked
  • Redress unobtainable for most Deaf and disabled people
  • Survivors feel without a voice in way redress processes work
  • Survivors feel left in the dark by inadequate information and contact
  • Lack of manaakitanga through stressful process
  • Advocacy and financial help hit and miss
  • Lack of independence or independent review
  • Frustration at lack of accountability
  • Failure to take preventive action and make system change
  • Long delays a cause of frustration
  • Apologies not meaningful
  • Financial payments are inadequate
  • Redress was inadequate to restore mana or oranga
  • No ability to respond to harm to whānau
  • Survivors felt powerless
  • Redress processes have caused further harm
Site Logo Light
Connect with us
  • Find us on Facebook


    • Legal Menu
      • Privacy policy
      • Terms
      • Accessibility
      • Contact us
    • Ngā pūrongo Reports
      • Whanaketia
      • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
      • Beautiful Children
      • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu
      • Tāwharautia: Pūrongo o te Wā
      • Administrative report
    • Ngā purapura ora Survivors
      • Getting help and support
      • Questions and answers
      • Survivor stories
    • Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono Research and engagement
      • How people engaged with the Inquiry
      • Public hearings
      • Research
    • Te tuara me tōna raupapa Background and material
      • About the Royal Commission
      • Inquiry team
      • Advisory Groups and Reference Groups
      • Quarterly reports
      • Timeline
      • Pānui
    • Kohinga tuhinga Document library
      • Document Library
      • Case studies
      • Recommendations
      • Summaries and guides

    © 2025 Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry