Skip to main content Skip to navigation within this section
Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

This Royal Commission is an independent inquiry into abuse in state care and in the care of faith-based institutions in Aotearoa New Zealand.

  • Reports Ngā pūrongo
    • Whanaketia
    • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
    • Beautiful Children: Inquiry into the Lake Alice Child and Adolescent Unit
    • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
    • Tāwharautia: Interim Report
    • Administrative Report
  • Survivors Ngā purapura ora
    • Survivor experiences
    • Survivor videos
    • Getting help and support
  • Research and engagement Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono
    • How people engaged with the Inquiry
    • Public hearings
    • Research
    • Evidence library
  • Background material Ngā raupapa tuara
    • About the Royal Commission
    • Inquiry team
    • Advisory groups and reference groups
    • Quarterly reports
    • Timeline
    • Questions and answers
    • Pānui
    • News
  • Document library Kohinga tuhinga
    • Document library
    • Case studies
    • Recommendations
    • Summaries and guides
Quick Exit
AdobeStock 101472581
  • Home
  • Reports
  • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
  • 2.5: Survivors’ experiences of State and faith redress processes
Listen

2.5: Survivors’ experiences of State and faith redress processes Introduction

Many survivors expressed deep dissatisfaction at the way State agencies and faith-based institutions dealt with their redress claims. Experiences varied, but in many cases, survivors found organisations to be self-interested, culturally insensitive, bureaucratic, legalistic, or all-powerful, providing a limited form of redress on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. They were given little information about a redress process but asked to provide information about themselves and all the intimate details of their abuse, sometimes repeatedly. Many were made to wait years for decisions and kept in the dark while they waited. Many survivors had to face processes with only limited whānau support, due to damaged family relationships.

Survivors felt that State and faith-based organisations profoundly misunderstood the abuse they had experienced, and how deeply that abuse had altered the course of their lives. The redress offered through State and faith-based processes provided little support for them to recover or rebuild their lives or restore their mana and oranga, or wellbeing. Little if anything was offered in the way of support with housing, or employment and the provision of counselling has generally been limited to the period after the investigation process and for a limited time. Rather, survivors were offered payments that many saw as inadequate, and apologies that many regarded as meaningless. Most accepted these offers because they felt they had no other option.

Māori survivors who sought redress experienced no recognition of their mana or the mana of Māori in decision-making; there was no support to connect and reconnect with whānau, whakapapa and culture, or to rediscover lost values. For them, the processes reflected Pākehā values. Pacific people, Deaf and disabled people faced their own additional hurdles, too. In this section, survivors describe their difficulties in seeking redress – difficulties that were largely the same in State and faith-based redress processes.

 

Next: Māori faces and tikanga values nowhere to be seen

1-1-introduction-10
  • 2.5: Survivors’ experiences of State and faith redress processes
  • Māori faces and tikanga values nowhere to be seen
  • Pacific survivors’ culture overlooked
  • Redress unobtainable for most Deaf and disabled people
  • Survivors feel without a voice in way redress processes work
  • Survivors feel left in the dark by inadequate information and contact
  • Lack of manaakitanga through stressful process
  • Advocacy and financial help hit and miss
  • Lack of independence or independent review
  • Frustration at lack of accountability
  • Failure to take preventive action and make system change
  • Long delays a cause of frustration
  • Apologies not meaningful
  • Financial payments are inadequate
  • Redress was inadequate to restore mana or oranga
  • No ability to respond to harm to whānau
  • Survivors felt powerless
  • Redress processes have caused further harm
Site Logo Light
Connect with us
  • Find us on Facebook


    • Legal Menu
      • Privacy policy
      • Terms
      • Accessibility
      • Contact us
    • Ngā pūrongo Reports
      • Whanaketia
      • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
      • Beautiful Children
      • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu
      • Tāwharautia: Pūrongo o te Wā
      • Administrative report
    • Ngā purapura ora Survivors
      • Getting help and support
      • Questions and answers
      • Survivor stories
    • Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono Research and engagement
      • How people engaged with the Inquiry
      • Public hearings
      • Research
    • Te tuara me tōna raupapa Background and material
      • About the Royal Commission
      • Inquiry team
      • Advisory Groups and Reference Groups
      • Quarterly reports
      • Timeline
      • Pānui
    • Kohinga tuhinga Document library
      • Document Library
      • Case studies
      • Recommendations
      • Summaries and guides

    © 2025 Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry