Skip to main content Skip to navigation within this section
Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

This Royal Commission is an independent inquiry into abuse in state care and in the care of faith-based institutions in Aotearoa New Zealand.

  • Reports Ngā pūrongo
    • Whanaketia
    • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
    • Beautiful Children: Inquiry into the Lake Alice Child and Adolescent Unit
    • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
    • Tāwharautia: Interim Report
    • Administrative Report
  • Survivors Ngā purapura ora
    • Survivor experiences
    • Survivor videos
    • Getting help and support
  • Research and engagement Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono
    • How people engaged with the Inquiry
    • Public hearings
    • Research
    • Evidence library
  • Background material Ngā raupapa tuara
    • About the Royal Commission
    • Inquiry team
    • Advisory groups and reference groups
    • Quarterly reports
    • Timeline
    • Questions and answers
    • Pānui
    • News
  • Document library Kohinga tuhinga
    • Document library
    • Case studies
    • Recommendations
    • Summaries and guides
Quick Exit
AdobeStock 101472581
  • Home
  • Reports
  • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
  • Long delays a cause of frustration
Listen

Long delays a cause of frustration

A persistent theme among survivors was the length of time it took some government agencies and faith-based institutions to make a decision about their claim. Survivors could wait a year or more just to receive records of their time in care, followed by several more years before an investigation got under way or was completed.

Toni Jarvis waited 17 years to receive his settlement offer, and others waited for more than a decade. Wiremu Waikari described his 12-year wait as unreasonable, while Kerry Johnson said he had been waiting 15 years and his claim was still not settled. He said it seemed to him “the Government just wants to sweep this all under the carpet”.

The Ministry of Social Development said the average length of time to process a claim was four years, a performance it acknowledged was not good enough. The Ministry of Education said claims typically took more than two years to process, and in fact had only processed 46 claims in a 10 year period.

Survivors said the deadlines agencies gave them often shifted. Kathleen O’Connor said the Ministry of Social Development would push out the date every time she made contact, which made her angry because “they were constantly putting the buck on someone else. There was always a reason: they were snowed under, they had a backlog, they didn’t have enough staff”. Phillipa Wilson had the same experience with the ministry. She was initially told her claim would take about eight months, then 18 months because it was short of staff, then eventually three to four years.

Delays are also less common but also present with some faith-based organisations. Ms K said she asked the Catholic Church for help before the criminal trials of the two former Marist Brothers who had abused her and received a reply a year later. Mary Marshall’s claim for redress left her shattered because it continually triggered memories of her abuse and the physical terror that accompanied it.

The long delays left many survivors at the end of their tethers and under pressure to accept an offer simply to put an end to the delays and move on with their lives. Chassy Duncan, who made a claim in 2014 and received an offer six years later, said he accepted it so he could put the claims process behind him. He knew the offer wasn’t as good as it could be, but after a lot of thought took it anyway.

 

Next: Apologies not meaningful

1-1-introduction-10
  • 2.5: Survivors’ experiences of State and faith redress processes
  • Māori faces and tikanga values nowhere to be seen
  • Pacific survivors’ culture overlooked
  • Redress unobtainable for most Deaf and disabled people
  • Survivors feel without a voice in way redress processes work
  • Survivors feel left in the dark by inadequate information and contact
  • Lack of manaakitanga through stressful process
  • Advocacy and financial help hit and miss
  • Lack of independence or independent review
  • Frustration at lack of accountability
  • Failure to take preventive action and make system change
  • Long delays a cause of frustration
  • Apologies not meaningful
  • Financial payments are inadequate
  • Redress was inadequate to restore mana or oranga
  • No ability to respond to harm to whānau
  • Survivors felt powerless
  • Redress processes have caused further harm
Site Logo Light
Connect with us
  • Find us on Facebook


    • Legal Menu
      • Privacy policy
      • Terms
      • Accessibility
      • Contact us
    • Ngā pūrongo Reports
      • Whanaketia
      • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
      • Beautiful Children
      • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu
      • Tāwharautia: Pūrongo o te Wā
      • Administrative report
    • Ngā purapura ora Survivors
      • Getting help and support
      • Questions and answers
      • Survivor stories
    • Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono Research and engagement
      • How people engaged with the Inquiry
      • Public hearings
      • Research
    • Te tuara me tōna raupapa Background and material
      • About the Royal Commission
      • Inquiry team
      • Advisory Groups and Reference Groups
      • Quarterly reports
      • Timeline
      • Pānui
    • Kohinga tuhinga Document library
      • Document Library
      • Case studies
      • Recommendations
      • Summaries and guides

    © 2025 Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry