Skip to main content Skip to navigation within this section
Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

This Royal Commission is an independent inquiry into abuse in state care and in the care of faith-based institutions in Aotearoa New Zealand.

  • Reports Ngā pūrongo
    • Whanaketia
    • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
    • Beautiful Children: Inquiry into the Lake Alice Child and Adolescent Unit
    • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
    • Tāwharautia: Interim Report
    • Administrative Report
  • Survivors Ngā purapura ora
    • Survivor experiences
    • Survivor videos
    • Getting help and support
  • Research and engagement Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono
    • How people engaged with the Inquiry
    • Public hearings
    • Research
    • Evidence library
  • Background material Ngā raupapa tuara
    • About the Royal Commission
    • Inquiry team
    • Advisory groups and reference groups
    • Quarterly reports
    • Timeline
    • Questions and answers
    • Pānui
    • News
  • Document library Kohinga tuhinga
    • Document library
    • Case studies
    • Recommendations
    • Summaries and guides
Quick Exit
AdobeStock 101472581
  • Home
  • Reports
  • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu from Redress to Puretumu Torowhānui
  • Redress unobtainable for most Deaf and disabled people
Listen

Redress unobtainable for most Deaf and disabled people

Survivors with physical or learning disability face additional hurdles to getting redress, whether as a result of communication difficulties, a lack of support or a lack of awareness about what abuse was or that redress was available. Several disabled survivors said that for a long time they had not even known that neglect, violence and other forms of harm counted as abuse. Others had not known what redress was or what treatment qualified for redress. Deaf survivor Jarrod Burrell said he had “never heard of redress. No one has ever explained what redress is, let alone that it as an option for survivors of abuse like me”.  He also said he was unaware of any information about redress in New Zealand Sign Language or any attempt to promote such information.

Many disabled survivors who are aware of redress processes might find it difficult to know how to make a claim, according to survivor and disability rights activist, Sir Robert Martin. One survivor with autism explained that pursuing a claim with the Ministry of Health was completely unattainable for them:

“Here’s a systemic issue. I actually can’t. Like this is, I literally, I would find it too difficult.”

In addition to the challenges faced by all survivors, disabled survivors also felt that redress processes were not created in consultation with disabled people, or even with disabled people in mind. Some couldn’t get hold of or understand information about their time in care. Most, including those who still rely on disability support services, lacked the necessary autonomy, support and safeguards required to make decisions about getting redress. Survivors said the advocacy or help necessary to overcome these barriers was generally unavailable. New Zealand Sign Language interpreters were in very short supply, as were legal and other services with the skills and training required to work effectively with disabled survivors.

 

Next: Survivors feel without a voice in way redress processes work

1-1-introduction-10
  • 2.5: Survivors’ experiences of State and faith redress processes
  • Māori faces and tikanga values nowhere to be seen
  • Pacific survivors’ culture overlooked
  • Redress unobtainable for most Deaf and disabled people
  • Survivors feel without a voice in way redress processes work
  • Survivors feel left in the dark by inadequate information and contact
  • Lack of manaakitanga through stressful process
  • Advocacy and financial help hit and miss
  • Lack of independence or independent review
  • Frustration at lack of accountability
  • Failure to take preventive action and make system change
  • Long delays a cause of frustration
  • Apologies not meaningful
  • Financial payments are inadequate
  • Redress was inadequate to restore mana or oranga
  • No ability to respond to harm to whānau
  • Survivors felt powerless
  • Redress processes have caused further harm
Site Logo Light
Connect with us
  • Find us on Facebook


    • Legal Menu
      • Privacy policy
      • Terms
      • Accessibility
      • Contact us
    • Ngā pūrongo Reports
      • Whanaketia
      • Stolen Lives, Marked Souls
      • Beautiful Children
      • He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu
      • Tāwharautia: Pūrongo o te Wā
      • Administrative report
    • Ngā purapura ora Survivors
      • Getting help and support
      • Questions and answers
      • Survivor stories
    • Rangahau me ngā tūhonhono Research and engagement
      • How people engaged with the Inquiry
      • Public hearings
      • Research
    • Te tuara me tōna raupapa Background and material
      • About the Royal Commission
      • Inquiry team
      • Advisory Groups and Reference Groups
      • Quarterly reports
      • Timeline
      • Pānui
    • Kohinga tuhinga Document library
      • Document Library
      • Case studies
      • Recommendations
      • Summaries and guides

    © 2025 Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry