Skip to main content Skip to navigation within this section
Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry

This Royal Commission is an independent inquiry into abuse in state care and in the care of faith-based institutions in Aotearoa New Zealand.

0800 222 727 or Text 8185

Weekdays 8:30am - 4:30pm

Share your experience Kōrerotia mai tō wheako
  • About the Royal Commission Mō te Kōmihana a te Karauna
    • What the Royal Commission is about
    • How it works
    • Te Tiriti o Waitangi
    • Te Taumata
    • Survivor Advisory Group
    • Terms of Reference
    • Working with Māori
    • Our people
    • Deaf community
    • Pacific community
    • Disability and Mental Health community
  • Our inquiries Ā mātou uiui
    • Faith-based Institutions Response
    • State Institutional Response
    • Disability and mental health
    • Foster Care
    • Māori experiences
    • Pacific peoples experiences
    • State and faith-based redress
    • Children's State residential care
    • State psychiatric care
    • Protestant and Other Faiths
    • Catholic Church
    • Youth Justice care
  • Our progress Kauneketanga
    • Reports
    • News
    • Timeline
    • Document Library
    • Latest updates
    • Engagement
  • Get involved Kia whai wāhi mai
    • Sharing your experience
    • Sharing your experience from prison
  • For survivors Mā ngā purapura ora
    • Getting help and support
    • Legal assistance
    • Questions and answers
    • Survivor stories
    • Easy Read
    • Complaints Process
Quick Exit
AdobeStock 101472581
  • Home
  • Our progress
  • Reports
  • (English) He Purapura Ora, he Māra Tipu.
  • Volume 1
  • 2.5 Survivors’ experiences of State and faith redress processes
  • Pacific survivors’ culture overlooked
Listen

Pacific survivors’ culture overlooked

Most Pacific survivors also described cultural obstacles to full and proper redress for the harm done to them. They said both State and faith-based redress processes reflected Palagi outlooks and values and were insensitive to the needs of Pacific cultures. Many of the obstacles to reporting abuse including strong respect for authority and church leaders, power imbalances, fear of not being believed, the imperative not to disrupt the vā among and between families also applied to seeking redress. Traditional hierarchies related to age, status and gender influence who can safely speak about sex and sexual abuse, as well as who is likely to be supported by their family. People who spoke out risked bringing fakamā or shame on their families, and risk isolation from family, church and community relationships.

“When you pull away from [the Church], you pull away from so much of the cultural stuff, so much of the support village stuff. It’s almost like being ostracised from your whānau. Because of what’s happened, we don’t do any of those events any more. There are also events that we do not get invited to anymore.”

These risks can outweigh a survivor’s motivation to seek redress. Survivors said exercising sensitivity to these cultural considerations would have gone a long way towards improving the claims process – and might well have encouraged other Pacific survivors to come forward. But they said there was no such cultural sensitivity because both State and faith-based processes were steeped in Palagi values.

David Crichton said everyone he dealt with at the Ministry of Social Development was Palagi and unable to appreciate what it felt like to be “lied to about your cultural identity and the existence of your extended family”.

Many Pacific survivors said redress processes were insensitive to the needs of Pacific cultures, felt unsafe, and lacked transparency and accountability.

Fa’amoana Luafutu described his first interview with Ministry of Social Development as deeply disconcerting. He said he was asked his name at the outset and replied Fa’amoana, to which the woman from the ministry responded: “Okay John, and who have you brought with you today?” He said he repeated that his name was Fa’amoana, yet continued to be addressed as John. Eventually he said he was asked what name he would prefer and he answered: “I don’t care, I don’t care what you call me, whatever’s easier.”  

Pacific survivors said they found redress processes complex, difficult to understand and drawn-out. They also said processes seemed designed to protect the reputation of the organisation rather than provide redress that would help them rebuild their lives. Frances Tagaloa, who engaged in a redress process with the Catholic Church, said she was left in the dark about the redress process until a settlement letter arrived. She had no input into the process, no support or legal advice, and no influence over whether her abuser was held to account. Ms CU, who also engaged with the Catholic Church, said that her background education and experience helped her understand the complaints process. Without these advantages, she said, she would have been “scared and afraid” about going through the processes, and would have found it very confusing.

The use of standardised, rather than culturally informed, processes was particularly difficult for Pacific survivors who, throughout their time in care, had been cut off from their cultures, languages and identities. They said they should have had input into the form of the apology and the venue for its delivery, which, as a matter of course, should have been a public place. Hake Halo said it would have meant a lot to him if “someone very high up in the government genuinely apologise[d] to me and [sought] my forgiveness. Even though [Prime Minister] Helen Clark apologised, it was to everybody. I should have got a personal apology that was addressed to me”.

 

Next: Redress unobtainable for most Deaf and disabled people

2.5 Survivors’ experiences of State and faith redress processes
  • 2.5: Survivors’ experiences of State and faith redress processes
  • Māori faces and tikanga values nowhere to be seen
  • Pacific survivors’ culture overlooked
  • Redress unobtainable for most Deaf and disabled people
  • Survivors feel without a voice in way redress processes work
  • Survivors feel left in the dark by inadequate information and contact
  • Lack of manaakitanga through stressful process
  • Advocacy and financial help hit and miss
  • Lack of independence or independent review
  • Frustration at lack of accountability
  • Failure to take preventive action and make system change
  • Long delays a cause of frustration
  • Apologies not meaningful
  • Financial payments are inadequate
  • Redress was inadequate to restore mana or oranga
  • No ability to respond to harm to whānau
  • Survivors felt powerless
  • Redress processes have caused further harm

So far, more than 2,644 survivors have shared their experience. Join them. Ā mohoa nei, neke atu i te 2,644 purapura ora kua kōrero mai i ō rātou haerenga. Hono mai.

We cannot make any findings, reach conclusions or make recommendations without hearing the voices of those who have the lived experience of state or faith-based care.

Share your experience Kōrerotia mai tō wheako
Phone 0800 222 727 or Text Message on 8185 contact@abuseincare.org.nz
Connect with us
  • Find us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on LinkedIn

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Accessibility
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Contact us

  • Mō te Kōmihana a te Karauna About the Royal Commission
    • What the Royal Commission is about
    • How it works
    • Te Tiriti o Waitangi
    • Te Taumata
    • Survivor Advisory Group
    • Terms of Reference
    • Working with Māori
    • Our people
    • Deaf community
    • Pacific community
  • Ā mātou uiui Our inquiries
    • Māori experiences
    • Pacific People's experiences
    • Disabled peoples experience
    • State and faith-based redress
    • State psychiatric care
    • Children's State residential care
    • Anglican Church
    • Catholic Church
  • Kauneketanga Our progress
    • Latest updates
    • Reports
    • News
    • Timeline
    • Document Library
  • Kia whai wāhi mai Get involved
    • Sharing your experience
    • Sharing your experience from prison
  • Mā ngā purapura ora For survivors
    • Getting help and support
    • Legal assistance
    • Questions and answers
    • Survivor stories

© 2023 Abuse in Care - Royal Commission of Inquiry